This SOP describes the informed consent process, the required and additional elements of informed consent, waiver/alteration criteria, and regulatory and legal requirements required in obtaining informed consent from participants.
Investigators are required to obtain informed consent as a legal and ethical obligation.
Informed consent is an essential part of ethical human subjects research. IRBs
and investigators are responsible for ensuring that researchers provide informed
consent to participants before research participation unless the requirement for
informed consent is waived or altered by the IRB.
Please note: IRB-approved consent forms must be used when recruiting human subjects for research under the auspices of WVU. Upon review and approval, the electronic system will watermark each page of the PDF file uploaded as the consent documents. The watermark will contain the approval date and the expiration date, along with the protocol number.
3.1. The requirement to obtain the informed consent of individuals before
involving them in research is founded on the principle of respect for persons,
one of the three ethical principles governing human subjects research described
in the Belmont Report. Respect for persons requires that individuals are treated
as autonomous agents, the rights and welfare of persons with diminished autonomy
are appropriately protected, and potential research participants are “given the
opportunity to choose what shall or shall not happen to them” (Belmont Report).
3.2. The consent process involves more than a consent form. Informed consent
has been described as an “interactive process that involves the researcher informing
potential participants of the purposes and procedures of the research, the risks
and benefits associated with the research, and how the data provided by the participant
will be protected and stored” (AAA Statement on Ethnography and Institutional Review
Boards). This discussion must be culturally and linguistically appropriate for
the population under study.
3.3. In addition to the language and content of the consent process, the
nature and circumstances of the process are also important aspects of informed
consent. Circumstances such as, who will conduct the consent discussion, who will
provide consent, and the timing of obtaining consent (including any waiting period
between informing the participant and obtaining consent), are critical to facilitating
the participant’s understanding of what has been disclosed and promoting the voluntariness
of the participant’s decision about whether or not to participate in the research.
3.4. Informed consent is an ongoing process. Even in the absence of new
information or changes to research procedures, periodic review or confirmation
of a participant’s consent is often desirable (e.g., in studies that take place
over a long period, particularly complex studies, or longitudinal studies involving
progressive disorders or aging populations). Participants must be able to freely
decide whether to withdraw or to continue participating in the research at all
times.
3.5. Projects involving deception or incomplete disclosure of material aspects of the research must meet the criteria for a waiver or alteration of informed consent. When appropriate, participants should be given additional pertinent information (debriefed) after participating in the research. Debriefing procedures and materials must be submitted to the IRB. If investigators believe a debriefing is not an appropriate procedure for the proposed study or that debriefing could cause participants more harm than the deception/incomplete disclosure itself, appropriate justification must be provided to the IRB. The IRB will make the final determination about whether debriefing is necessary and whether the proposed process is sufficient.
The consent process must have all of the following attributes to comply with federal
regulations for informed consent:
4.1. The circumstances of the consent process will provide the participant
or legally authorized representative sufficient opportunity to consider whether
to participate.
4.2. The circumstances of the consent process will minimize the possibility
of coercion or undue influence.
4.3. The information provided during the consent process will be presented
in language understandable to the participant or the participant’s legally authorized
representative.The consent discussion should not include complex, technical, or
highly specialized language or medical jargon that would not be understandable
to potential participants.
4.4. The information communicated during the consent process is free of exculpatory language through which the participant or legally authorized representative is made to waive or appear to waive any of the participant’s legal rights or to release (or appear torelease) the investigator, sponsor, or the university (or its agents) from liability for negligence.
Lengthy and/or complex consent documents must begin with a concise and focused summary of the key information that is most likely to assist a prospective participant or legally authorized representative in understanding the reasons why one might or might not want to participate in the research and to encourage discussion about the pros and cons of research participation. The following items may be addressed in this summary:
Other additional information may be needed based on the study design and the intended
participant population. Information listed in the concise summary need not be repeated
later in the consent form unless that information is necessary to help ensure the
consent remains understandable to the participant.
The information provided during the consent process must be consistent with the federal requirements. Unless informed consent is waived or altered by the IRB (see “Waiver or Alteration of Informed Consent” below), the consent process must include the following basic elements:
One or more of the following elements will also be provided to potential participants during the consent process, when appropriate:
Please note: Additional information beyond the basic and additional elements of consent (above) may also be required when the IRB determines that this information would meaningfully add to the protection of research participants.
The circumstances of the consent process must provide potential participants or their legally authorized representatives sufficient opportunity to consider whether to participate and minimize the possibility of coercion or undue influence. Additional safeguards are required to provide the rights and welfare of participants when some or all of the participants are likely to be vulnerable to coercion or undue influence (e.g., prisoners, children, students, employees, educationally or economically disadvantaged individuals, or individuals with impaired decision-making capacity). Additional requirements for obtaining informed consent (or assent) in specific populations are described in the following WVU OHRP policies:
According to the federal regulations, the IRB has the authority to observe or have a third party observe the consent process. Observation of the consent process can provide additional protections to research participants (e.g., in studies involving adults with impaired decision-making capacity or studies with complex interventions). Observation can be performed by members of the IRB, WVU OHRP staff, or other individuals designated by the IRB, investigator(s), or sponsor.
In the limited circumstances described below, the IRBs can approve a consent process
that does not include, or alters some or all of the elements of informed consent.
The IRB can waive or alter the requirements for informed consent for non-exempt research examining state or local public benefit or service programs or certain features of those programs if all of the following criteria are met:
The WVU IRB can waive or alter the requirements for informed consent for non-exempt
research that meets
all of the following criteria:
8.3. Research Designed to Study Conditions in Children
The IRB can waive or alter the parental or guardian permission requirements for
certain non-exempt research involving children. For more information, please see
SOP 015: Assent and Parental Permission.
8.4. Planned Emergency Research
The IRB can approve a waiver of the requirements for informed consent for non-exempt
research in life-threatening situations when it is not possible to obtain informed
consent from participants or their legally authorized representatives. For more
information, see SOP 054: Planned Emergency Research.
8.5. Emergency Use of Investigational
For more information about exceptions to the requirements for informed consent
in “emergency use” (life-threatening) situations in which it is not possible to
obtain informed consent from patients before using an investigational drug, biologic,
or device when no other standard acceptable treatment is available, please see
SOP 053: Emergency Use of Investigational Drugs, Biologics, or Devices.
Federal regulations require that the informed consent process is conducted in “language understandable” to research participants, and, with certain exceptions, that informed consent is documented in writing by the use of a written consent form approved by the IRB and signed and dated by the individual or individual’s legally authorized representative. In limited situations, the regulations permit the informed consent process to be conducted orally, with a written “short form” consent document. This process may be used to obtain the informed consent of non-English speaking participants or their legally authorized representatives, as described below.
The short form consent document may be used only in the following circumstances:
When the study population or location includes people who speak a language other
than English, or where the circumstances of participant enrollment provide sufficient
time for preparation and IRB review and approval of translated documents, the short
form should not be used.
Information or biospecimens can be obtained for screening, recruiting, or determining eligibility of prospective participants without informed consent (and without the need for the IRB to waive informed consent) if eitherof the following conditions is met:
For clinical trials conducted or supported by a federal department or agency, the Final Rule (Revised Common Rule) requires that a copy of an unsigned, IRB-approved consent form be posted on a publicly available federal website (ClinicalTrials.gov). The funding awardee or federal department/agency is responsible for posting the form after recruitment is complete but no later than 60 days after the last participant visit. Proprietary or institutionally sensitive information may be redacted; only one consent form per research project must be posted regardless of the number of participant groups or research project sites.
WVU Policies:
SOP 013: Vulnerable Populations
SOP 014: Research Involving Children
SOP 015: Assent and Parental Permission
SOP 047: Research Involving Prisoners
SOP 048: Research Involving Pregnant Women, Neonates, and Fetuses
SOP 053: Emergency Use of Investigational Drugs, Biologics, or Devices
SOP 054: Planned Emergency Research
SOP 055: Electronic Informed Consent
Federal Regulations:
21 CFR 50.20
21 CFR 50.25
21 CFR 56.109
21 CFR 56.111
45 CFR 46.111
45 CFR 46.116
AAHRRP:
Element II.3.F.